Monday 23 March 2009

Four Essential Principles of Emerging Market Success

Emerging markets are high risk and high reward. In my work as an attorney representing Western companies in emerging markets, I have concluded there are four essential elements to emerging market success: a good partner, an open mind, active participation, and extreme patience.

I have seen enough essential similarities between such diverse countries as Russia, Korea (ten years ago when it was still an emerging market country), Vietnam, and even the Gambia and Papua New Guinea, to believe certain core generalizations hold true for all or nearly all emerging market nations. Just as a good concept, a strong market, and good execution are necessary in all countries, so too are these four simple principles the keys to success in emerging market nations.

PRINCIPLE ONE: A Good Partner is the sine qua non of Success.

The quality of the local partner is the indispensable element for emerging market success. So where do you begin?

Start with due diligence. Before doing business with anyone, you must first determine what you need from your partner in the particular country in which you will be conducting business. In my experience, foreign companies need a local partner who is effective, cooperative, and (most important of all) trustworthy.

Emerging market countries almost always have less-than-fully-formed legal systems. Their laws are oftentimes slanted towards the government and away from free markets. Their courts are slow and often corrupt. Form takes precedence over substance in ways completely unfamiliar to Westerners. One small technical miscue on your part might eliminate your right to sue your partner for having stolen all of your money. It might even lead to you and your company being kicked out of the country, while your assets remain.

Of course you should do your best to avoid technical miscues, but the better strategy is to pick your partner well.

So what should you look for in a local partner? Political connections? Yes and no:

  • Yes, because you probably will need someone with sufficient dexterity to maneuver around often-suffocating business laws and a bureaucracy that may try to cut in on your business at every turn.
  • No, if you think that is all you will need. Just as in the West, the politically connected are usually more a "government type" than a business person. Partnering with someone in an emerging country with whom you would never consider partnering back home is a mistake.

Political clout in emerging market countries is often more effective for avoiding legal responsibility for something like a debt than it is in generating business revenues. I have seen countless instances where a foreign company partners with someone because he "is tight with the governor," only to see the business crushed by the new governor as part of his house cleaning. The best partner is politically connected only to the extent necessary for business success.

Your partner's character and reputation are your protection in countries where the court system is not. Do not partner in any sense of that term without having conducted thorough due diligence.

Get to know your potential partner. If he is legitimate and wants to work with you for the long term, he will expect you to want to get to know him better and think nothing of your wanting multiple meetings before signing any deal.

Use every source you have to find out about your potential partner. Check his references, particularly those of other foreign firms with whom he has worked. Hire a local lawyer or investigator to confirm he and his various businesses are in good standing with all creditors and taxing authorities. If your potential partner is in Vladivostok, Russia or Qingdao, China, hiring a lawyer in Moscow or Shanghai will probably not be good enough. Find someone you can trust with contacts where your potential partner conducts business.

PRINCIPLE TWO: Keep an Open Mind. Assume Nothing.

Doing business in an emerging market means taking nothing for granted. I have a mantra for my own legal work in these countries that translates well to the business world: "Assume nothing, but assume that you are assuming things without even realizing you are doing so."

Things will be different. Very different. Things you take for granted in your home country might not exist in the emerging market country. Things you take for granted in your home country might be the exact opposite in the emerging market country. Things you think will be totally different in the emerging market country may be exactly the same. Things you thought you knew about emerging market countries based on what you know from another emerging market country may be completely different in a neighboring country, or even in another region within the same country.

The principle, one more time: Keep an open mind, and assume nothing.

PRINCIPLE THREE: Participate in Everything.

In many emerging market countries, local businesses take advantage of corruption to avoid complying with laws. This may work for the locals, but it won't work for you. The easiest way for a local rival to drive you out is for you to do something illegal. Neither you nor your government will have good grounds to complain if your rival gets your business closed down due to your illegal activity. It might even be your own partner who reports you so he can assume full ownership and control of your business.

You must have your own people on the ground, leading, training, and instructing on business methods, business ethics, efficiency, and quality control, among other things.

We have a saying in our law office that one day of face-to-face meetings with local counsel is equivalent to one month of telephone calls and e-mails in terms of getting things done. This is equally true on the business front.

PRINCIPLE FOUR: Exercise Extreme Patience.

This principle stems from the maxim that everything takes twice as long as you think it will. If it takes twice as long in the West, triple that in emerging market countries. You'll go in both as a businessperson and a teacher—and in both roles, the learning curve of your partner will almost certainly take way more time to deal with than you think.

For example, many emerging market countries have a history where "bad business" meant "thinking long-term." A year or two after the fall of Soviet communism, I was involved in a matter where an investor put $250,000 into a Russian joint venture. The business very quickly was making good money and all indicators pointed towards steadily increasing profitability. But, quite quickly, the Russian company stole the $250,000. Was it so irrational for him to think so short term in a country where the government and tax systems had such a history of unpredictability?

Remember: It takes patience to encourage change of mindset. Extreme patience.

EMERGING MARKET SUCCESS

Emerging markets cannot be approached with a quick-kill mentality. Above all else, emerging market success demands a good partner, an open mind, a high degree of participation, and extreme patience.

It is certainly risky. It can also be very profitable.

Dan Harris is an attorney with the international law firm of Harris & Moure, pllc., which focuses on assisting businesses in or involved with Asia, Eastern Europe, or North America. http://www.harrismoure.com

Friday 24 August 2007

Ethics and Investment Performance in Emerging Markets

One of the major reasons why most people in the 'developed' world are still sceptical about emerging markets is the issue of ethics. Theres been many strong debates about whether doing business or investing in emerging markets should be any different from the more developed market.

For most people investing for the long term - ethics, governance, social and environmental issues have become more relevant. I have been thinking on why these issues should be more important or relevant than financial performance.

Even the challenge posed by climate change is not as serious in emerging markets as it is presently in the developed market. China is one of the largest consumers of energy but even the Chinese government says about 70% (700 million) of its population still live in abject poverty and in rural areas, this is despite the rapid growth of the economy.

What these suggest is that by all means China, Inida and other serious emerging markets will continue to pursue growth and development…and probably at the expense of the environment. Is that ethical? The G8 countries will also continue to mount pressures on these countries to cut carbon emission (devilishly I'll call that 'suspend development') and my question remains the same..''is that ethical''?

So how do we define ethics, how do emerging markets become developed markets if they cannot use the same source of energy that the developed world has used to get to where they are today? Yes there are lots of research going on to develop energy-efficient fuels but how long will that take so as not to hamper continuos growth? These are some of the questions long term investors are asking before they invest their hard-earned money in these markets. If the more developed economy can force the emerging markets to 'suspend development till we find energy efficient fuels', would it still make sense to invest or do business in these markets?

Another main argument of the guys 'suspicious' of investments in emerging markets is that most of these markets have got an ageing bull market which makes investors to overvalue growth and undervalue risk. I mean I'm so excited about some of my investments in one of these markets (even though I just started!) and I'm almost being carried away by the performance. I guess the key to navigating these risks is to undertand that corporate governance is getting better in these markets and over time the issues of ethics, governance , social and environmental issues that affect business and investment performance will be given the attention they deserved. Meanwhile, it's time everyone started to understand how to play in these markets because in business, ignorance is not bliss. The time is coming and its already here gradually when it wouldn’t matter where you worked, lived or do business as changes in the macro-economic environment in a country will have a ripple effect all over the world.

What do you think will happen to the share price of FTSE or Nasdaq quoted companies if their Data Centres in Brussels crashed, if their Call Centres and Software Developers in India are on strike. More and more these boundaries will fade into insignificance…and that’s why I think we should define ethics with a win-win paradigm (if that’s possible) and also balance our portfolios with investments & business operations in emerging markets.

So what do you think about my rantings…of course I have a biased position already :) but I'll like to know what you think…for, against or neutral and if it’s a superior argument I might move to your camp!

Thanks for reading!

Tuesday 17 July 2007

In business, ignorance is not bliss

I can't over-emphasize the importance of aligning your business strategy and re-focussing to incorporate a seamless integration with emerging markets. I have been reading and watching with interest the different discussions on the pros and cons of investing or doing business with the BRICS countries and other emerging markets but I was so excited when I read this report from BT Global Services - global service provider that has refocussed itself to play in the global market. They commissioned a research to find out what the CEOs of large organizations know about BRICS and other emerging markets, you'll be shocked at the results!

Read the full report at http://www.btglobalservices.com/business/global/en/business/collaboration/BRICS.html

If you think the cost of acquiring knowledge to understand and navigate these markets successfully is too high, if you consider the cost of the risks and you say its not worth it, then calculate what the cost of ignorance and in-action will be in the next 20 years…that’s if you're still in business!